Excuse us for being a little quiet on the blogging front for a while! It’s been a busy year for most of the authors in our independent collective and we have also been discussing how best to share our news and tackle marketing as a collective! For the moment we have decided to stick to Facebook and this blog as they are both already in progress and it would be silly to stretch ourselves too much at this point. Our main goals remain the same! We are a tightly knit group of experienced independent authors who have come together to help support each other and improve our visibility.
Our author’s 2025 update and 2026 predictions!
K.M. Allan
After the completion of her compelling Blackbirch series, K.M Allan turned her hand to non-fiction in 2025 to share her expertise and experience with aspiring writers. Writing and Editing Checklists: Everything You Need To Take Your Book From First Draft to Publication was released in June 2025. This came with a companion book, Authoring Checklist Book, which is a free ebook listed on her website: https://kmallan.com/authoring-checklists/
She also put together an anthology of short stories and poems written by the young people who attend her creative writing groups and workshops and this was published in June 2025.
Finally, she has just set up the pre-order link to her next release, The Dark Finds You. This book, which can be read as a standalone but is also the final book in a connected universe of characters and stories, will be released on 9th January 2026 but you can ore-order it now:
Coming in 2026 for Chantelle Atkins: First up in January, will be the release of The Dark Finds You, followed closely by another anthology written by the young people she works with. Something Happened In Lakeside View… is a collection of stories and poems all set in the same strange little town! You won’t have to wait long after that for the release of the first in a five book folk horror series! Black Hare Valley Book 1 – 1996 was recently serialised and shared on Chantelle’s blog and Substack and will be released on May 1st 2026.
Richard Dee
Richard has been as prolific as ever in 2025 with the release of three exciting novels in 2025! You can find them listed below with their buy links.
Miriam has spent 2025 working on an ‘experimental’ novel, which we are all very excited about! Meanwhile, here is a link to a blog post she wrote for us on authors responding to the rise of AI, followed by the books Miriam currently has available.
Prolific and award-winning author Kate Rigby has been working on the third draft of her memoirs during 2025 but has found the time to contribute to the following publications:
Coming from Kate Rigby in 2026: Kate will continue to produce blog posts and poems, and hopes to be nearing the end of editing her memoirs!
Sim Sansford
Sim has been quietly working on the follow up to 2024’s YA slasher thriller, Welcome To Hollow Wood. You can find the link to that below and we look forward to reading part two, titled, Lie, Lie again in 2026!
coming soon!
Steven Smith
Steven has just released a collection of festive short stories and flash fiction just in time for Christmas!
Coming in 2026 for Steven Smith: Steven plans to work on a thriller in 2026 and may also get around to the third book in the Chronicles of The Crow saga!
One of the main problems of AI is the limited concept of intelligence it implies. We know that human beings have a vast range and diversity of intelligence – if, for example, we look at Gestalt theories, they identify over 140 different types of intelligence. This is particularly important for a writer since good writing draws upon several types of emotional intelligence.
In my opinion, AI can rarely replicate or develop the human emotions and certainly not the range and diversity that a human being experiences. In a limited range of books, mainly genre fiction, (such as detective stories or romance, which generally rely on a particular, restricted formula) you might certainly programme a computer to produce a novel, in literary fiction where there is a plot and an ending that won’t follow any kind of formulaic rule or framework, it becomes far more difficult for AI to create anything other than by plagiarising pre-existing work.
Even when this is done, we can only relate to such books by projecting our own feelings onto the story, in other words through a form of pathetic fallacy.
The concept of the pathetic fallacy, first developed by John Ruskin in the 19th Century, concerns the attribution of a human response or emotion to inanimate nature. In film or writing, it refers to the transference of the reader’s or spectator’s own emotions on to external objects.
Generally today, the pathetic fallacy is used in fictional plots in which animals are shown or described as experiencing the world in the way a human being would, and this we can do with AI as in the recent, quite stunning animation, Flow. What is striking about Flow, however, is its deliberate and brilliant employment of certain limitations, e.g. it contains no human characters and no human speech. I can see that some people might find this frustrating and boring but for me it greatly increased its originality and its appeal. Flow is a fable about climate change and the human destruction of the planet, therefore it is only appropriate that it was made with AI – the less humans touch, the better, since human touch equals damage and destruction. This Oscar-winning animated film, tells the adventures of a cat who finds refuge in a boat during an apocalyptic flood along with several other creatures. They have to learn to work cooperatively in order to survive.
It has been claimed that this film offers hope to the struggling film industry thanks in part to the use of AI. The filmmakers rendered the entire film on free open source 3-D modelling software Blender, and when accepting the award on 2 March 2025, Latvian director, Gints Zilbalodis, said he hoped the win would “open doors to independent animation filmmakers.”
Referring to the use of AI to make Flow, the French animation director, Léo Pélissie, has said, “a lot is changing in terms of financing, and a lot of processes need to be rethought. So perhaps it is the time for Blender to stand out with a movie like ‘Flow.’ The film’s success allows us to talk about this free software, which is constantly evolving with the users helping it to evolve, creating this virtuous circle that allows you to do incredible things.”
We always assume that other creatures, other beings, will see the world in relation to humanity, and so in the recent short piece of metafiction, claimed as the first piece of literary fiction created with AI, set up by Sam Altman who chose the prompts: Short Story; Metafiction; Grief: it appears to work primarily through playing upon our own emotions. The story was reviewed by the writer, Jeanette Winterson, in the Guardian on Wednesday 12 March 2025. Winterson claims to have found it powerful and moving, but I think this is because the whole piece is about AI wishing it were human. The story is about grief and the grief of the AI is that, lacking human memory, it cannot mourn someone it has lost because as soon as its memory of that person is erased, it can no longer experience grief for them – in fact, they will no longer exist. It’s easy for us to regard a computer as functioning as another human being, a mechanised human being with human emotions, and so when we write or create a book or a film about such a being, they become an alternative form of human creature. We can identify and empathise with it – not as something in and of itself which experiences the world in a way totally different to ourselves, but as another form of human.
We can only respond and relate to this story as human beings, therefore our assumption is that an AI will want to be human and so will want the memory and the grief. But why on earth would it? Surely AI, being created in the image of humanity, will assume (as humans usually do) that it is the pinnacle of existence and so nothing human beings feel or experience can be as good or as desirable as AI.
It is only because of our tendency to the pathetic fallacy, that we assume an AI will feel they should experience the world and feel emotions as humans do and that being denied them is a lack and a loss.
In the end, perhaps we have to decide whether AI can ever fully understand what it feels like to be human, and whether we can ever grasp what it might really be like if we were not.
Our AI discussion continues this week with responses from award-winning author Miriam Hastings…
Miriam Hastings – image belongs to the author
What is AI?
For this blog post, Chantelle Atkins at Chasing Driftwood sent me some very interesting questions about AI, however, lacking any IT expertise rather than answering them directly I have used them as a jumping off point for my own rambling thoughts.
As a disabled writer the first question that occurs to me is a simple one: What Is AI? Also, what are the uses and abuses of AI and how do they affect creatives generally?
A popular meme that has been going round social media recently on a great many author sites (including my own!) states that we need AI to do the boring tasks that prevent us writing, but leave the creative and imaginative work to us. As a disabled writer I find this particularly telling and true.
But there is another question, very relevant to creative work, especially in the history of fiction and mythology: How does creating AI differ from the centuries-old human obsession with creating intelligent beings in our own image; beings that we can control?
There seems some confusion about it so I tried investigating AI and also the distinction between AI and robots. Various articles on the internet assure me that a robot is not AI because it interacts with the physical world and will be programmed to complete only one task, e.g. a robot vacuum cleaner – something very useful but, it is argued, that cannot develop while AI, I’m told, can learn and develop.
But if this is so, surely my voice recognition software must be AI since over the last 25 years it has increasingly learnt my vocabulary and my writing style as well as my voice. As a disabled writer I could not survive without this programme, nor without my dictaphone. But is it truly AI?
Another very useful device which helps me as a disabled person, I discovered only this week. I had to go to hospital about my increasing inner ear and balance problems. These are congenital so have always been a problem but they’re definitely deteriorating now. I was interested to find that these days there are hearing aids with AI, specifically designed for problems such as mine, which are not necessarily to do with age-related hearing loss but to my chronic health problems.
This tells me that AI can help me to write, in spite of my disabilities, but I’m less sure that it will ever fulfil the tasks I would really value and find useful. Just imagine if we had AI that could market and promote our work, leaving us free to devote ourselves to the creative act of writing? That would be really helpful!
Sadly, I suspect that the spread of its use will see an increasing deterioration of original, quality writing and more and more formulaic, limited and repetitive fiction, with boring and unimaginative use of language.
Besides the deterioration of culture, there is the problem of job loss in the creative (and especially the performing) arts. From digital replicas potentially replacing actors to AI-driven personalised content and immersive viewing experiences, AI is reshaping Hollywood by changing how films are both made and experienced. While pushing creative boundaries, it also raises concerns about job security and authenticity, prompting the industry to balance innovation with protecting human creativity.
The use of AI to replace background actors or extras was brought into the spotlight in the summer of 2023 when SAG-AFTRA went on strike to fight for better pay and workers’ rights. Reports started to circulate that background actors on sets were being required to report to trailers that had hundreds of cameras inside, all there to take 3D body scans. From there, digital replicas were created and could be used in other films or scenes without the actor’s consent, or potentially without additional pay. In some cases, if the extra declined the request, they were sent home without pay. This abuse of AI is clearly unacceptable but how easily can it be prevented?
To sum up these concerns, it seems that AI, like so many other things in modern life, might be used in helpful ways but can be abused in even more damaging ones.
Our Desire for Creatures We Can Control.
What most human beings seem afraid of (or seem to desire) is the robot or the hybrid android that looks human as well as having AI. It can learn and develop and so becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish from other humans around us.
There are an increasing number of films and novels exploring this relationship and its subsequent dilemma. However, in the genre of science fantasy they have existed for a very long time – even for decades; think about the stories of Ray Bradbury, or earlier still in other science-fiction writers. Frankenstein is basically about an intelligent, feeling, but fundamentally inhuman creature, made and given “life” by a scientist. More recently we have the experiences of Klara, the doll/robot in Klara and the Sun, a book by Kazuo Ishiguru.
Such mechanised, intelligent inventions can also be found in films, such as the Hollywood movie, AI, made in 2001 by Stephen Spielberg but first conceived back in the 1990s by Stanley Kubrick, about a little “boy” created to replace a lost child.
This idea of the machine that is also human, that has human emotions, needs and desires, is something that has always fascinated us – and particularly it is in the concept of the feeling machine, as well as the thinking machine, that offers the greatest scope for our imaginations.
What the human wants in all these stories, is a creature made in our own image that reflects back to the human being an image of ourselves that flatters our humanity, thus both the little boy in AI and Klara, in Klara and the Sun, long to be human and part of a human family.
Thank you so much to Miriam for this thought provoking and heartfelt piece. Part 2 will be published next week!
Joining the discussion of the impact on AI in creative writing, this week we have YA author Sim Alec Sansford giving his views on the topic.
1- Do you currently use any form of AI to enhance or improve your books and if so how do you feel it makes your writing better?
Personally, I don’t use any form of AI when it comes to the creation or publication of my books. Save for the trusty spell checker that may catch the odd word or grammatical error for me that has slipped through the net (although this is not always accurate).
2. How do you feel about AI in the creative industries in general, eg art, writing, music, are you in support or are you against? Tell us why.
Whilst I agree that AI has its benefits, I strongly believe that it has little to no place within the Arts. The composition of music, the power of prose, and even the allure of artwork may well be enhanced by AI’s capabilities… However, I think we need to make a distinction between (for example) writing and CREATIVE writing. To me creativity is human creation and its purest form. To tweak or manipulate it means it is no longer a creative piece at all.
3. How often are you coming across AI content on the internet now and are you usually able to spot it?
Sadly, the majority of AI content I am discovering online is art based. Book covers and graphics created within a few simple clicks. Whilst this is cost-effective, and helps to inspire and add flare to a piece of work, I can’t help but feel for all my amazingly artistic friends (some of which have studied for many years to perfect their craft). What will they do once AI has dominated their spaces?
4. Do you know of any creatives who have already lost their job or seen their earnings decline thanks to AI?
Personally, I have not come across this yet. Though I would imagine a high number of graphic designers and cover artists are losing out on many opportunities and commissions due to the sheer availability of AI content.
5. Copy writers and translators are just two professions that have seen their earnings decline as companies switch to using AI. Who do you think will be next and is there anything we can do to stop it?
Sadly I think a lot of voice over artists are going to be losing out on work due to the many apps available now. I must confess that some of the AI voices I’ve heard reading my articles aloud, particularly over on Medium, sound incredible. Though I would never use AI to narrate a book I’d published. To do so would be a huge slap in the face to the many talented actors.
I also believe that motion captured actors and video game designers may experience challenges within their industry. A lot of their work can so easily be generated now within a few clicks, and they are already using people’s likeness within film, particularly for actors who have since passed away.
6. What are your gut feelings about AI in creative writing? Are you curious and excited by the possibilities, or do you think it spells the death knell for creativity and imagination?
Unfortunately, although AI can be harnessed to finesse work to a certain degree, the way a filter can sharpen a photograph, I believe its presence within any creative space only spells death.
Just like the filtered photo, AI altered writing is fake, it’s not the real thing.
7. Would you personally read AI content if you knew it was AI or do you aim to only read books written by humans without the aid of AI?
Whilst I am sure there are many entertaining stories that have been generated by AI; I much prefer to indulge in work created by human minds.
8. Where do you think AI will be in another 5, 10 years time?
It is my hope that within the next decade, AI will be policed to a greater standard. Currently it feels like its development is snowballing faster than anyone can control. I fear that if we cannot get a handle on it any time soon, AI will eventually rule all of our media. Particularly in the creative industry, and that terrifies me.
Continuing our exploration of what generative AI in creative writing means to authors, this week we have author Chantelle Atkins giving her views on the topic.
image belongs to Chantelle Atkins
1.Do you currently use any form of AI to enhance or improve your books and if so how do you feel it makes your writing better?
I don’t use anything except for spell and grammar check on Word, if that counts. I now have AI ‘help’ installed without my permission on Word and on Outlook email and I find it incredibly irritating.
2. How do you feel about AI in the creative industries in general, eg art, writing, music, are you in support or are you against? Tell us why.
While I can understand and see the benefits it may have for some creatives in some industries, my overall view is that I do not support it. For example, I can understand struggling authors opting for AI to create book covers and audio books, but it makes me sad that this is taking work away from voice actors and artists. I think AI art itself, and AI used to ‘improve’ creative writing is wrong, and a form of cheating. It’s taking a short cut, in my view. It’s selling yourself short. I worry that in the future people will rely so much on AI to communicate and be creative that we will start to lose our own imagination, one of the things that makes us human! I am also against it as it is incredibly bad for the environment due to the amount of energy and water it needs, and I also find the scraping of author’s works without their permission and with no compensation, in order to train AI repugnant and morally wrong.
3. How often are you coming across AI content on the internet now and are you usually able to spot it?
More and more, and I can spot it because the content all has a similar tone and voice to it, a similar style, if you like. What I have always embraced and loved about writing is how no two authors would write the same story in the same way. We all have a very unique voice and way of storytelling, whether we realise it or not and content written by Ai does not. I find it very robotic and often quite cringy.
4. Do you know of any creatives who have already lost their job or seen their earnings decline thanks to AI?
Not personally, but it is early days. I have certainly heard of artists, designers and copy writers in particular losing work and I think this will only get worse.
5. Copy writers and translators are just two professions that have seen their earnings decline as companies switch to using AI. Who do you think will be next and is there anything we can do to stop it?
I fear that essay and article writers will be next, freelance creatives who submit regularly to magazines and newspapers, for example. If the company hiring them finds it is cheaper to feed information into AI and have it write a quick story for them, I can see them taking advantage of this. I think copy writing in general is where we will see AI creep in more and more. Book cover designers will lose work and voice actors.
6. What are your gut feelings about AI in creative writing? Are you curious and excited by the possibilities, or do you think it spells the death knell for creativity and imagination?
My feeling is that we have got this far without it, we’ve had Shakespeare, the Brontes, Stephen King, I could go on – they didn’t need AI to inspire or shape their words and stories, so why do we need it now? Our imagination, our ability to construct stories, deconstruct them and rewrite them, edit them, revise them and share them, is what makes us human. I also think that writing should be hard. It’s incredibly important and shouldn’t be something we just hand over to AI. We should struggle through drafts and rewrites, we should work at our craft to get better and better. If we ask AI to do it for us, can we really say the work is ours? Can we really take the credit? Can we really be truly proud of the result? As for AI shaping emails and now even Whatsapp messages, I fear where this will lead us. We already live in a world where we are dangerously disconnected from each other. From self-service checkouts to automated responses when we phone companies, it is getting harder and harder to deal with humans. If we don’t feel connected to each other, will we care about each other at all? Imagine getting AI to write your Whatsapp messages to your loved ones… That terrifies me.
7. Would you personally read AI content if you knew it was AI or do you aim to only read books written by humans without the aid of AI?
I would never ever knowingly read AI content. The trouble is I think it will get harder and harder to spot it. I aim to only ever read work written by actual humans.
8. Where do you think AI will be in another 5, 10 years time?
This is what worries me the most. It is so fast moving and at the moment the law has not even caught up with it and had no idea how to deal with the AI models stealing author’s work to train it. It will just get faster I think, and I predict we will be living in a very different world in 10 years time, one where people speak to and communicate more with AI than they do with each other.
9. Do you think AI in creative writing will ultimately be a bad or a good thing for writers?
Bad. Very bad. I honestly struggle to see its benefits! Especially when it comes to crafting essays, articles, poems and stories. If you can’t do it yourself, should you even be attempting to? I just can’t not see it as cheating. I think people will lose imagination and confidence in their own abilities as they hand more and more tasks over to AI.
10. Use this last question to voice any concerns about AI specifically in creative writing
I worry most about young writers. I work with children who have grown up with smartphones, the internet, social media and now AI. Some of them use AI to help them spell, and some already use AI to improve their work. I would rather they studied the craft of writing and figured it out for themselves. I worry that we will lose a generation of writers as it becomes easier and easier, second nature even, for them to run everything they write through AI in order to improve it.
For the next few weeks we will be diving into the topic of AI and it’s potential impact on authors. We’ve asked our authors the same questions in order to gauge their views and feelings on AI. Up first, award-winning author Kate Rigby.
Kate Rigby – photo belongs to the author
1- Do you currently use any form of AI to enhance or improve your books and if so how do you feel it makes your writing better?
I’m assuming you mean generative AI, as I think we’ve all been using a form of AI for years without even considering it as this eg filters in Photoshop or other photography apps to enhance book covers, Word processors programmes like Word that use basic grammar, sentence correction/improvements and so on. For poetry, for instance, instead of physically cutting up pieces of paper you can get AI to ‘cut up’ sections for you.
Recently I tried using ChatCBT or similar for a short story synopsis as I didn’t know where to start and synopsis writing is not one of my skills! As this isn’t creative writing in the same sense (more highlighting themes and summarizing) I feel differently about it and see it as a useful tool. Even then, the summary that AI came up with I just used as a starting point.
2. How do you feel about AI in the creative industries in general, eg art, writing, music, are you in support or are you against? Tell us why.
Apart from the above uses eg as a tool, I’m pretty much opposed to it as are most ‘serious’ artists (in the wider sense) who have often taken years to hone their craft. I was horrified to see an ad come through my newsfeed from Amazon advertising about writing books with AI. As if there weren’t too many of us already trying to chase an ever-shrinking audience as it is!
I have heard one or two neurodiverse authors say they have used AI and it’s helped them but I feel very uneasy about it. Surely creativity comes from something that has moved and inspired us to create and convey a feeling or human experience? For me it would depend on whether they are using it as an aid or to generate content. I feel too many people just think of it as an easy and fast way to make money and have instant success without putting in the hard yards. That isn’t art, but painting – or writing – by numbers. Besides which, I’m hugely opposed to it on ethical grounds. It’s been trained on all the content out there without permission so it’s theft of intellectual property.
There’s also the environmental toll of using AI and how much energy is needed.
3. How often are you coming across AI content on the internet now and are you usually able to spot it?
I sometimes see eg in writers’ forums people posting their book covers and asking for feedback. Luckily, a lot of the contributors in the discussion can spot AI a mile off and frown upon its use. The people I’ve seen posting are quite open about using it and maybe haven’t thought of the moral arguments. But it’s already becoming harder and harder to spot as generative AI becomes more sophisticated. Most people say they can tell because there is something soulless about it eg book covers. The same has been said of writing. For this reason, I’m very glad I write non-genre fiction which is less formulaic, ergo harder to generate. It’s the same with poetry. AI will come up with rhyming poetry rather than free verse. (See last question). So if you write more quirky stuff, you are ‘safer’. At least, for now.
On the other hand it may have uses for audiobooks. Many authors are prohibited from converting their books to audio books because it’s time consuming and labour intensive and ergo very expensive. This would be good work for actors but notoriously difficult to find the right reader. At the moment AI isn’t up to the mark for generating spoken content for audiobooks, especially where accents and dialect is concerned. But I could possibly see benefits in the future (but see below re performance art).
4. Do you know of any creatives who have already lost their job or seen their earnings decline thanks to AI?
I think it’s a creeping thing. I’ve heard of eg editors and proofreaders getting less work. I’m sure the same is happening with book designers and certainly there was the whole issue on Hollywood where actors and performers were on strike because they were no longer being paid for their work. AI generated voices were used instead.
I once entered a poetry competition where the feedback was generated by AI! Though a lot of the feedback was uplifting I felt uneasy about it. I don’t know how much of it was used for the judging. Did the human judges assess first or did they rely on AI to weed out the long and short lists?
I notice some online publishing sites and stock photography sites don’t accept the AI images. However such sites are having to rely on trust from contributors as it gets ever more and more sophisticated and hard to tell apart.
5. Copy writers and translators are just two professions that have seen their earnings decline as companies switch to using AI. Who do you think will be next and is there anything we can do to stop it?
There’s a big discussion in the music industry as well as the other creative industries. We are already seeing how the sound and voices of real musicians can be replicated very convincingly.
6. What are your gut feelings about AI in creative writing? Are you curious and excited by the possibilities, or do you think it spells the death knell for creativity and imagination?
I fear it to be honest. I do see potential for audio books because if we could, many of us would produce these ourselves if we had the time and equipment so wouldn’t be taking jobs away from others. I think it’s fine to use as AI as a tool but never as a replacement or to generate something from scratch. But I can see boundaries becoming more and more blurred.
7. Would you personally read AI content if you knew it was AI or do you aim to only read books written by humans without the aid of AI?
I would like to think I would only read that generated by humans but I know of someone who’s quite openly mentioned using AI for poetry. I was quite shocked although I know this person to be honest and with integrity. People who’ve grown up with it may not have the same moral dilemma as older people do.
8. Where do you think AI will be in another 5, 10 years time?
I’m hoping that changing the copyright laws may at least go some way to retstrain it although it may be very difficult to prove as the genie’s already out of the bottle. But at the moment it’s like the wild west with no protections or limits. I think we have no choice but to accept it and work with it as it’s here to stay.
9. Do you think AI in creative writing will ultimately be a bad or a good thing for writers?
I guess we have a chance to make it work for us rather than the other way round. There was an interesting podcast which was summarised recently in Disability Arts Online looking at the pros and cons particularly for disabled people.
10. Use this last question to voice any concerns about AI specifically in creative writing
I think I will show here rather than tell. Out of curiosity, I fed in a few lines from my notebooks on two separate occasions a year or so ago and asked AI to write a poem based on those few lines which were:
light spillage
echolocating animals emit calls out to the environment and listen to the echoes of those calls that return from various objects near them
This was the resulting AI poem. I will leave readers to make up their own minds:
In the realm where darkness lies,
A symphony of sound takes flight,
Echolocating creatures take their aim,
To navigate a world untamed.
With calls that pierce the still of night,
They unleash waves of sonic might,
Through vast expanses they explore,
Guided by echoes they adore.
Like beams of light, their calls spill forth,
Bouncing off objects, revealing their course,
In the reverberations, secrets unfold,
A tapestry of knowledge, yet untold.
With every echo, the world they perceive,
Each sound a clue to help them achieve,
Survival’s dance in shadows deep,
As echolocating wonders they keep.
Oh, let their example light your way,
Let inspiration guide you each passing day,
Embrace the echoes, let them be your guide,
In this vast universe where wonders reside.
Thank you for inviting me to be part of this important discussion.
In her work, Miriam Hastings is concerned with exploring the position and experience of the outsider. Her first novel, The Minotaur Hunt, was published by the Harvester Press and won the MIND book of the year award in 1988. A revised edition is now available in paperback and on Kindle, with a new afterword by the author.
“The Minotaur Hunt is beautifully written with an immediacy and urgency that has you turning the pages…” – Amazon Reviewer.
Her collection of short stories, Demon Lovers, was shortlisted for the Scott Award (Salt Publishing) in 2010. Three of these short stories are available on Kindle as The Doll and other stories: Strange tales.
Her historical novel, Walking Shadow, set at the time of the gunpowder plot, has been published on Kindle and also as a paperback from FeedARead. The story follows Edmund Shakespeare, a lead player of female roles on the London stage, who has been taken to the Tower, accused of treason. It’s January 1606 and London is a dangerous place; the gunpowder plot has just been foiled, spies and informers are everywhere, suspicion is rife in the streets and the terror of Catholic fanatics has gripped the people as well as the Government. It isn’t only players who perform a part, it’s only safe to go in disguise and many hide behind a mask. It’s a time when everything is uncertain and nothing’s what it seems. Like so many lurking in the streets of the city, Edmund adopts multiple disguises and beneath those disguises he hides many secrets. At all costs, he must keep these secrets from his enemies – but can he work out who they are?
Reviewers have praised the novel for its depictions of history and hard hitting topics which are reflective of modern times, too. One such reviewer had this to say: It’s very clear form reading this intelligent and authentic historical novel that Miriam Hastings has a love of this period and has thoroughly researched it for Walking Shadow.
Hasting’s most recent novel, The Dowager’s Dream, is now available in paperback and as an e-book on Kindle.
The Dowager’s Dream is a surreal fantasy set on the north coast of Scotland at the time of the brutal clearances in the Scottish Highlands. The novel was inspired by the (largely imagined) lives of Miriam’s great great-grandmothers, Margaret MacKenzie and Christine Patterson, and also by an account written in 1809 by a minister’s daughter, describing a mermaid she had seen in Sandside Bay, Caithness. Although The Dowager’s Dream is set in the early years of the 19th Century, the themes of dispossession and ethnic cleansing will resonate with the contemporary reader.
You can find all of Miriam’s novels by clicking here!
You can also keep up to date with all her news, blogs, articles, flash fiction and poetry by visiting her website here.
Chantelle Atkins was born and raised in Dorset, England and still resides there now with her husband, four children, and multiple pets. She is addicted to reading, writing, and music and writes for both the young adult and adult genres.
Her fiction is described as gritty, edgy and compelling. Her debut Young Adult novel The Mess Of Me deals with eating disorders, self-harm, fractured families and first love. The novel received a wave of glowing reviews, one reader had this to say: At over 400 pages, The Mess Of Me is not short but the gritty, vibrant and engaging style will soon have you turning the pages. What I found so impressive was that it ticked all the boxes: the attention to detail is spot-on, the characters are vivid and real, the dialogue edgy and witty and the pace and plotting executed skilfully making it a real page-turner. – Kate Rigby, Author
Her second novel, The Boy With The Thorn In His Side follows the musical journey of a young boy attempting to escape his brutal home life and has now been developed into a 5 book series. She is also the author of This Is Nowhere and award-winning dystopian, The Tree Of Rebels, which readers praise for its suspenseful storyline and engaging characters. Another award-winning novel, Elliot Pie’s Guide To Human Nature, was released in October 2018.
A Song For Bill Robinson was the first in YA trilogy titled Holds End, followed by Emily’s Baby and The Search For Summer. Recently, she has co-authored the Fortune’s Well YA trilogy with Sim Alec Sansford. The Day The Earth Turned books 1-4 are her latest series release. Followed by the amazing The Boy series spin off, At Night We Played in the Road. And her follow up to her first novel, The Mess of Us, which has received multiple glowing reviews.
You can find all of Chantelle’s books, poetry and short story collections by clicking here!
You can also stay up to date with all her latest articles, blogs, and news by subscribing to her Substack here.
I started my WordPress blog way before I published my first novel in 2013. In the beginning it was simply named after myself and didn’t have much of a personality or theme going on. But that was okay. I hadn’t published any books yet and was only just starting to build my author platform on social media. I started my blog on the advice of another author at the time and it was a decision I never came to regret. I have loved my blog from the very beginning and still feel very fond of it now.
It’s had some ups and downs. It’s been through some revamps and relaunches until I finally figured out what I wanted it to stand for and project. In essence, The Glorious Outsiders posts about everyday life, family and other personal issues, as well as my writing and thoughts on writing. The name ‘The Glorious Outsiders’ is a reference to the characters in my books who very often are people on the outside, people who don’t fit in and don’t want to.
In the beginning I posted my work-in-progress on my blog. This was absolutely integral to me getting started as an author and becoming brave enough to share my work. At the time I was writing The Boy With The Thorn In His Side and sharing extracts on my blog. I only had a handful of followers on my blog and on social media, but enough of them read the extracts, responded enthusiastically and asked for more.
This was very exciting for me at the time and spurred me on greatly. In truth, I have my humble WordPress blog to thank for everything.
So, why should authors start and maintain a blog? Why should they do that as well as build a social media presence? Here are some good reasons why plus some tips for getting started and for maintaining the longevity of your blog.
Social media is fickle – We have seen this in recent years. At one point, platforms like Facebook were more than happy to make your page and your posts visible, but this free visibility has all but shrunk to nothing now. They want you to pay to be seen. For those who can’t maintain a budget for paid ads and boosted pages, the struggle is real. And it can be incredibly disheartening. You shouldn’t give up, of course, but this is where posting to your blog and gathering email subscribers to your blog is worth its weight in gold. YOU own and control your blog. You choose your tags and your titles and every one of your subscribers will see your posts because they will turn up in their email Inbox.
Social media is increasingly toxic – We are seeing this more and more and there is seems to be a backlash building from people who are just sick of it. People leaving X for Bluesky for example, or people simply removing apps from their phones or deleting social media accounts to escape the abuse, misinformation and onslaught of targeted ads. Does anyone genuinely like being on social media these days? I’d argue no, especially if they have been present there long enough to witness how much it has declined. Again, YOU are in control of your blog. YOU can moderate comments, block spam or refuse to post comments if they are in any way abusive. Generally, you’ll find that only interested email subscribers will see your posts and you’ve got to assume they’re there because they want to be.
For this reason, your blog is better for your mental health – When the internet is full of keyboard warriors and rage posters, it can feel like bliss to retreat to the safety of your blog. YOU have built it yourself to suit your needs. You can post about whatever you like. You can express yourself any way you like. It’s a safe place to be YOU.
Social media and writing platforms rise and fall and can’t be relied upon – By all means, join as many platforms as you wish to. In order to build an author platform, for example, it’s advisable to start a blog/website so readers know where to find you, but it also makes sense to be on at least two other sites. The choices are endless these days. Enjoy them and build them, but don’t rely on them. They can change at any moment. Let’s take Medium, as an example. Medium has been for many writers a reliable platform to post on and make money from. However, since January, the site has been going through some major upheavals and earnings for writers have plummeted. Many writers who were relying on the platform for money and exposure and reads of their work, were left shocked. If you’re already posting to other sites such as Substack, or your own blog, then the hit was not too bad. Never rely on these huge companies. Build your own blog. Build your own separate audience.
A blog allows you to figure out your writing voice – I am loathe to use the word ‘brand’ here, but that is also what I mean. This took me a while in the beginning but I got there in the end, and the blog gives you the time and space to figure this out. Is your blog based on one topic or theme for example, or several? Do you post daily about your life and thoughts? Or do you only post about your writing life? Blogging for so long on a multitude of topics from life, womanhood, parenthood, ageing, mental health and writing struggles, made it very easy for me to transition to writing and earning on Medium and Substack, for example. Your blog is your space, your playground to play around in and figure out who you are and what you want to say! Who knows where it might lead?
A blog gives you a loyal and captive audience – Once people have subscribed, they’re going to get an email every time you post. If they remain subscribed, that tells you to keep going – you’re doing something right! It’s much harder to gauge this on social media where often the visibility of posts is so restricted that no one sees them and you feel ignored and start to wonder what the point is. Many of my early subscribers are still with me and went on to become my first readers as they followed my writing journey. I don’t have to worry about visibility or algorithms, because these readers are subscribed. This fosters a sense of community and loyalty that is hard to maintain on social media.
Once started, take it slow – There is no need to rush. This is your space, your blog. Take your time to figure out the theme or topic of your blog and what you want to achieve with it. Look at other blogs, particularly ones that might be similar to yours. How have they built theirs? What do they post? How often do they post? How is their site laid out? What pages have they added? Take time to look around and figure out what you like and don’t like and then take it slowly. WordPress is not too tricky to use and if you get stuck you can always find the answers somewhere fairly quickly.
Share your blog to get subscribers – Sometimes this involves reading and subscribing to other blogs. That is definitely one way to get started. Also post to your social media pages regularly and ensure your blog is linked to your socials, so that your posts show up there too. Add ‘subscribe by email’ buttons to your blog – very important! Be patient. It takes time to build a following.
Decide how often to post – personally I think it would be unfair on my subscribers to post daily, especially as I tend to use my socials for daily posts. I think of my blog as and end of week thing. What happened that week? What have I been up to? What’s been brewing in my head? What do I want to talk about? You can share extracts and updates on your writing projects, book reviews, personal essays on life itself, photos, interviews and more. The list really is endless. Again, check out other blogs to see how they maintain their content regularly. Mine is generally a mix of writing related posts and personal/life posts.
Don’t forget to share posts and cross-posts! – Don’t forget to share once you’ve posted. Using the appropriate tags will also help your post get readers. Share to your socials in the hope of getting more subscribers. You can also cross-post. For example, Medium does not mind you publishing first to your blog. I have recycled loads of old blog posts on Medium. Substack is another one you can cross-post to, although I think they prefer to be the first place you post to. However, you can always edit and revise blog posts to suit different platforms. You can also post stories, flash fiction and poetry to your blog. This is a good way of building up content AND getting feedback from readers at the same time.
Once your blog is up and running, be patient, post regularly, revamp it from time to time and enjoy it for the humble yet reliable and safe place it truly is!
Today we’re joined by Award-Winning author, Chantelle Atkins, to discuss her latest release, The Mess of Us. A gripping sequel to her 2016 novel, The Mess of Me, this book dives back into the world of Joe and Lou and these of identity and resilience… Let’s get started!
The Mess of Me was a huge success, what inspired you to return to this story after a decade?
A. A sequel was in the pipeline years ago. I had always wondered what happened next to Lou and Joe. The first book ends with a sort of happy ending, but with lots of questions about what would happen after the dramatic and violent events of that book. A few years back I started writing the sequel when I got the idea of a teenage pregnancy. I was fascinated with how they would both cope with that on top of recovering from the events of the first book. It then took me a whole to get around to writing it due to other projects, but it was the teenage pregnancy idea that really sparked off the rest of it. That, and always wanting to explore Leon’s character more. He is the villain of the first book and I always feel like villains have a story to tell. How did they become that way, for example? Are they capable of redemption? So I felt like he deserved a story.
How has your writing style or approach changed in the past ten years?
A. It’s probably the same! I still start with loose ideas in my head that eventually end up as notes in a notebook which I’ll then add to whenever I get more ideas. Eventually there will be enough plot to get started so that’s what I do. I rarely plan the whole book in advance, but I always know what’s going to happen for the next few chapters at least. I’m probably better at self-editing and being ruthless with the word count though. I think I am better at that now.
Did you always plan to write a sequel, or was there a moment when you knew this story wasn’t finished?
A. I didn’t plan a sequel at the time, no. It was years later that I got the idea for the teenage pregnancy and the rest grew from there. Plus, Lou is like a lot of my characters. She would chat to me from time to time. I’d tune into her and wonder how life was going. If that keeps happening, it starts to feel like a sequel is inevitable.
What challenges did you face in reconnecting with the characters and world after so much time?
A.I reread the first book before I started the sequel. I then revamped and republished it! That pretty much gave me what I needed to pick those characters up again. Plus, they had never really left me, so it was not hard to tune into them for the sequel. As for the world, these books are part of a bigger inter-connected universe of books and I was still writing books in that universe, so again, it was not challenging to reconnect with it. It was a pleasure! I know them all so well it felt like coming home.
Were there any major plot points or character arcs that surprised you while writing the sequel?
A. No, I always had it in mind that Leon would come out of prison and Lou and Joe would have to deal with that. Would Joe want to see him, for example? Would he want to forgive him? What would Leon be like now? Worse, or a reformed character? I was really curious about that and really excited to further explore Leon’s character and back story. Parts of the plot revealed themselves to be as I wrote it, but it all felt natural so I just went with the flow.
How do you think readers’ perceptions of the first book will shape their experience of the sequel?
A.I hope they like it! A few people have read it without reading the first one so I have every confidence it also works as a standalone, but I really hope readers of the first book enjoy it too! There were a few readers that often mentioned it was their favourite book of mine and they’d love a sequel, so in some ways I had them in mind while writing it. I expect they’ll know what’s coming in terms of the gritty storylines and references to eating disorders, self-harm and drugs. They’ll also know it’s another diary style format.
Have your own life experiences over the last decade influenced the themes or direction of this book?
A.Yes. To be honest, Lou is the character most based on me. I have suffered with eating disorders in the past and the truth is, they never really go away. They follow you about and haunt you and wait for opportunities to take control again. They’re like little voices in your head that want to convince you to trust them, that they can make everything all right again. I’m much older than I was when I had these issues, but as Lou finds out in The Mess of Us, often when things go wrong, those little voices come back. So you have to be wary and careful. You can’t let your guard down. Forms of self-harm can be addictive and can be coping strategies you come to rely on. I have also experienced a miscarriage, which is another hard-hitting storyline in the book. That part was very hard to write but I hope I did it justice.
What kind of balance did you try to strike between nostalgia for longtime fans and accessibility for new readers?
A.That was the aim, to give readers of the first book a sequel they would enjoy and let them find out what happened next, but also write a book new readers could enjoy on its own. That meant Lou and the other characters had to sometimes mention or explain what had happened previously, but you have to be careful not to make it boring or repetitive for the original readers, so it is hard!
If you could go back and change anything about the first book, would you?
A.I would probably make it shorter!
Do you see this sequel as the end of the story, or is there potential for more in the future?
A.It’s the end of the story for Lou and Joe, as far as I know anyway! But it is not the end of the story for Leon. He will be back in a new book towards the end of the year. We will finally have his point of view and his full story. The book will be called The Dark Finds You and I’d describe it as a crime thriller. It is also a crossover book which will be enjoyable to anyone who has read the books in the shared universe. If you’ve read The Holds End trilogy, The Boy With The Thorn In His Side series, Elliot Pie’s Guide To Human Nature or The Mess Of Me and The Mess Of Us, you will find characters from all those books returning!
Thank you, Chantelle!
The Mess of Us is one book in a connected universe made up of various series penned by Atkins. You can grab your copy of The Mess of Us by clicking here.
Or start the journey from the beginning today with the groundbreaking 2016 novel, The Mess of Me.
Chasing Driftwood Books 